NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McWilliam v Chee [2024] NSWCATAP 245 Hearing dates: 27 March, 13 August 2024 Date of orders: 03 December 2024 Decision date: 03 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: E Bishop SC, Senior Member G Burton SC, Senior Member Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The order made on 1 February 2024 for suspension of the operation of the order for possession made on 30 January 2024 in matter number 2024/00013238 is discharged. (3) In place of the suspension in order 2, order that vacant possession of the premises at 4/187 Edwin Street, Croydon is to be given by the tenants on or before 28 days after the date of this decision. Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedural fairness — Evidence not allowed and considered by Tribunal at hearing — Tenants' failure to file evidence by the dates directed by the Tribunal — Alleged retaliatory eviction — s 115 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) — Whether Tribunal applied a wrong principle to the onus of proof by requiring expert evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 80(2), cl 12(1) of Sch 4 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 85, 115 Cases Cited: Batshon v Sutton Motors Homebush Pty Limited [2024] NSWCATAP 114 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Cominos v Di Rico [2016] NSWCATAP 5 Hughes v Hume Community Housing Association Co Ltd [2023] NSWCATAP 109 Orr v Cobar Management Pty Ltd (2020) 103 NSWLR 36; [2020] NSWCCA 220 Orr v Hunter Quarries Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCCA 39 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Selkirk v The Owners – Strata Plan No 2661 [2024] NSWCATAP 17 Unique Commercial Group Pty Ltd v Cusumano [2024] NSWCATAP 204 Wilson v Chan & Naylor Parramatta Pty Ltd atf Chan & Naylor Paramatta Trust [2020] NSWCA 62 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jeong McWilliam (First Appellant) Yvette Nillesen (Second Appellant) Austin Kwong Chee (First Respondent) Lyndy Ying Yan (Second Respondent) Representation: First Appellant (Self-Represented) Second Appellant (Self-Represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate