NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Norris [2023] NSWDC 659 Hearing dates: 29 – 31 May 2023 Date of orders: 9 June 2023 Decision date: 09 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Beckett DCJ Decision: See paragraph [82] Catchwords: CRIME - EVIDENCE — Coincidence evidence — Tendency evidence – Admissibility – probative value – similarity – fires Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: CW v The Queen [2010] VSCA 288 Davies v The Queen [2019] VSCA 66 DSJ v R (2012) 84 NSWLR 758 Elomar v The Queen (2014) 316 ALR 206 IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 289 Patton v The Queen [2021] VSCA 104 Perry v The Queen (1982) 150 CLR 580 PNJ v DPP [2010] VSCA 88; 27 VR 146 R v Gale; R v Duckworth [2012] NSWCCA 174 R v Matonwal [2016] NSWCCA 174 R v MR [2013] NSWCCA 236 R v Nassif [2004] NSWCCA 433 R v Zhang (2005) 158 A Crim R 504 Selby v R [2017] NSWCCA 40 Tamara Hunt v R [2017] VSCA 196 Xie v The Queen (2021) 386 ALR 371 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel Crown: Ms Ward (Solicitor Advocate) Defence: Mr Park
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate