NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kollias v Pharmacy Council of NSW (No 2) [2024] NSWCATOD 198 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 December 2024 Decision date: 10 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing is dispensed with. (2) The respondent is to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, not including the appellant's costs of his stay application. (3) The appellant is to pay respondent's costs of the appellant's stay application. (4) All costs are to be paid as agreed or as assessed in accordance with the application costs legislation. Catchwords: COSTS – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 150, 150A, 159, 159B; cl 13 of Sch 5D Cases Cited: Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Kollias v Pharmacy Council of New South Wales [2024] NSWCATOD 152 Qasim v HCCC [2015] NSWCA 282 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John Kollias, Appellant Pharmacy Council of NSW, Respondent Representation: Counsel:
M Hutchings (Appellant) A Petrie (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Appellant) Health Professional Councils Authority (Respondent) File Number(s): 2024/00064372 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s 64(1)(a) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) publication of the names of any patients referred to in the material filed by the parties is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate