NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chahrouk v Bardouh (No 2) [2024] NSWCATAP 251 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 10 December 2024 Decision date: 10 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R C Titterton OAM, Senior Member D Fairlie, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing is dispensed with. (2) The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs as agreed or as assessed in accordance with the applicable costs legislation. Catchwords: COSTS – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2023 (NSW), ss 4, 50, 60, 80 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), rr 38, 38A Cases Cited: Beecraft Pty Ltd v Tudor; Tudor v Beecraft Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATCD 119: Culina v Timilty Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATCD 109 eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94 Westerweller v The Owners Strata Plan No 18482 [2023] NSWCATAP 113 Category: Costs Parties: Mohamad Chahrouk t/as MC concreting Services (Appellant) Fatema Bardouh (Respondent) Representation: Appellant (self-represented) Respondent (self-represented) File Number(s): 2024/00222371 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 07 May 2024 Before: G Bassett, General Member File Number(s): 2023/00400618 (formerly HB 23/16604)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate