NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: de Robillard v Council of the New South Wales Bar Association; Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v de Robillard [2024] NSWCA 298 Hearing dates: 27 November, 12 December 2024 Date of orders: 12 December 2024 Decision date: 13 December 2024 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: The recusal application be dismissed. Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES — Application for recusal — Whether apprehended bias — Claim of lack of independence — Based on association with family member or other judges of Supreme Court — Claim of prejudgment — Based on conduct during the hearing — Recusal application made 10 weeks after judgment reserved and after notice of listing for judgment — Whether waiver of any right to object Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Amendment Act 2004 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW), ss 38FC(2), 167AA Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) s 23(1)(c) Practice Note SC Gen 22 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 46(4), 121(3) Cases Cited: Charisteas v Charisteas (2021) 273 CLR 289; [2021] HCA 29 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Another (2019) 268 CLR 76; [2019] HCA 50 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Isbester v Knox City Council (2015) 255 CLR 135; [2015] HCA 20 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 87; [1990] HCA 31 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 New South Wales Bar Association v de Robillard [2004] NSWADT 45 Polson v Harrison [2021] NSWCA 23 QYFM v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 15; (2023) 97 ALJR 419 Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 200 CLR 386; [1999] HCA 57 Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568; [1989] HCA 44 Webb v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 41; [1994] HCA 30 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Christian Roger de Robillard (Applicant) Council of the New South Wales Bar Association (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C R de Robillard (Self-represented) (Applicant) A Poukchanski (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate