NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shao v Crown Global Capital Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 302 Hearing dates: 11 December 2024 Decision date: 19 December 2024 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Payne JA at [2]; Adamson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal. (2) Order the appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — construction — Facility Agreement between joint lenders and borrower company — where "Lender" in opening words of agreement refers to both individual lenders — whether reference to "Lender" in clause concerning issue of redemption notices by borrower to "the Lender" means either or both of them — where meaning of "Lender" throughout the agreement is a question of construction CONTRACTS — where Facility Agreement required two lenders nominate a bank account into which proceeds could be paid — where only one lender nominated an account — where proceeds of facility paid into nominated account in breach of requirements of agreement such that borrower did not obtain good discharge of its debt — where proceedings as between the two lenders were litigated — whether those proceedings amounted to ratification of rogue lender's nomination such that the borrower obtained good discharge of its debt — whether right of action now lies against borrower Cases Cited: Ardern v Bank of New South Wales [1956] VLR 569 Federation Insurance Limited v Wasson (1987) 163 CLR 303 at 317; [1987] HCA 34 Harrisons & Crossfield Ltd v London North Western Railway Company [1917] 2 KB 755 Howard Smith and Company Limited v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68; [1907] HCA 38 Lamshed v Lamshed (1963) 109 CLR 440; [1963] HCA 60 Lissenden v C.A.V. Bosch Ltd [1940] AC 412 McIntyre v Gye (1994) 51 FCR 472 McKenzie v Albany Finance Ltd [2004] WASCA 301 Mizzi v Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 37 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77; [2018] HCA 45 Vella v Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 505 Verschures Creameries Limited v Hull and Netherlands Steamship Company Limited [1921] 2 KB 608 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yakun Shao (Appellant) Crown Global Capital Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Crown Group Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Horowitz / M Hazan (Appellant) S A Lawrance SC / C Ernst (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate