NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tompkins v Fonseka [2024] NSWCATAP 262 Hearing dates: 3 December 2024 Date of orders: 20 December 2024 Decision date: 20 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President D Goldstein, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed, except for the purposes of order 2 below. (2) Order 2 made in proceedings 2024/00031420 on 26 August 2024, is set aside and in its place, the Appeal Panel orders the Appellant to pay the Respondents' $790 within seven days. (3) The stay is lifted. Catchwords: Appeal – Dividing Fences Act – no written record of reasons – contested view as to whether oral reasons were given. Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 (NSW) Dividing Fences Act 1991 (NSW) Cases Cited: Nil Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Edmund John Tompkins (Appellant) Jude Fonseka (First Respondent) Roshanie Fonseka (Second Respondent) Representation: Appellant (Self-represented) First Respondent (Self-represented) Second Respondent (Self-represented) File Number(s): 2024/00334948 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Date of Decision: 26 August 2024 Before: S Bliim, General Member File Number(s): 2024/00031420
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate