NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clough v Breen (No. 6) [2024] NSWSC 1634 Hearing dates: 3 June, 18 July, 20 August, 26 September, and 11 November 2024. Date of orders: 18 December 2024 Decision date: 18 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Slattery J Decision: Interim orders varied and continued to form final relief between the parties. Specified gross sum costs order made. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Amending, varying, and setting aside – interlocutory regime of orders imposed on parties engaged in a long-running dispute in relation to easements – final judgment given – whether the interlocutory regime of orders should be continued on a permanent basis and if so, whether those orders should be varied. COSTS – specified gross sum costs order – Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(4)(c) – long-running dispute between two neighbours involving multiple proceedings – final judgment given – discretionary factors relevant to making a specified gross sum costs order – need to accelerate the disengagement of the parties from their present disputes and to avoid further aggravating contests between them including in relation to costs assessment – whether a specified gross sum order should be made instead of a costs assessment. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56(1), 57(1)(d), 60, and 98(4)(c) Cases Cited: Aquaqueen International Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 500 Australasian Performing Rights Assoc Ltd v Marlin [1999] FCA 1006 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Breen v Clough [2017] NSWSC 1681 Capello v HomeBuilding Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 268 Clough v Breen [2020] NSWSC 653 Clough v Breen & Anor [2022] NSWSC 1026 Clough v Breen (No. 4) [2023] NSWSC 1155 Clough v Breen (No.5) [2024] NSWSC 337 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Halliday v SACS Group Pty Ltd [1993] HCA 13; 67 ALJR 678 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No.3) [2015] NSWCA 121 Prospect County Council v Cross (1990) 21 NSWLR 601 Simone Starr-Diamond v Talus Diamond (No. 4) (2013) 272 FLR 414; (2013) 224 A Crim R 523; [2013] NSWSC 81 Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Christine May Clough First Defendant/Cross-Claimant: Douglas Martin Breen Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant: Tracey Jane Dillon Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: D O'Connor Defendants/Cross-Claimants: M McGirr
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate