NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Flanagan [2024] NSWCCA 249 Hearing dates: 22 November 2024 Date of orders: 22 November 2024 Decision date: 20 December 2024 Before: Hamill J at [1] N Adams J at [2] Coleman J at [9] Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — Appeals — Crown appeal against sentence — Manifest inadequacy — Aggregate sentence — Totality — Aggregate sentence not reflecting the totality of the criminality — Appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aryal v R [2021] NSWCCA 2 Ayoub v R [2024] NSWCCA 168 Bojlevski v R [2024] NSWCCA 208 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Cahyadi v R (2007) [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Legge v R [2007] NSWCCA 244 R v Brown [2012] NSWCCA 199 R v Grover [2013] NSWCCA 149 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; (1999) 106 A Crim R 149; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327; [1999] NSWCCA 435 R v Sara [2020] NSWCCA 119 WS v R [2023] NSWCCA 52 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Appellant) Paul Flanagan (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Tran (Appellant) P Krisenthal (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate