NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sprout Trading NSW Pty Ltd trading as Sprout Ag v PBH Trading Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1647 Hearing dates: 19-22 November 2024 Date of orders: 19 December 2024 Decision date: 19 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hmelnitsky J Decision: 1. The parties are to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to my reasons on or before 7 February 2025. 2. The parties are to file and serve any evidence and short submissions on costs on or before 7 February 2025. 3. The parties are to file and serve any evidence and short submissions in reply on the question of costs on or before 14 February 2025. Catchwords: EMPLOYMENT AND INDUSTRIAL LAW — Contract — Restraint of trade — Where there was a Services Agreement between the plaintiff and the first defendant — Where a restraint clause in favour of the plaintiff bound the defendants to certain obligations — Whether the defendants breached the restraint clause by "soliciting", "canvassing", "securing", "diverting" or "attempting to divert" former clients of the plaintiff to themselves or a third party after Services Agreement terminated — Where most former clients approached second defendant after termination of the Services Agreement for assistance — Whether "secure" or "divert" could capture a passive receipt of instructions from a former client — Whether restraint clause was valid under s 4 of the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) — Whether restraint clause was reasonable — Whether plaintiff had a legitimate protectable interest — Where plaintiff was franchisee under a Franchise Agreement — Where second defendant knew most former clients personally, long before Services Agreement entered into EQUITY — Fiduciary Duties — Whether a fiduciary duty existed between plaintiff and the defendants — Whether defendants breached a fiduciary duty by doing work for former clients of the plaintiff — Whether obligations subsisted beyond the termination of the relationship Legislation Cited: Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW), s 4 Cases Cited: Agricultural Land Management Ltd v Jackson (No 2) (2014) 48 WAR 1; [2014] WASC 102 Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co Pty Ltd (1973) 133 CLR 288; [1973] HCA 40 Ancient Order of Foresters in Victoria Friendly Society Ltd v Lifeplan Australia Friendly Society Ltd (2018) 265 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 43 Anderson v Canaccord Genuity Financial Ltd (2023) 113 NSWLR 151; [2023] NSWCA 294 Avtex Airservices Pty Ltd v Bartsch (1992) 107 ALR 539 Barrett v Ecco Personnel Pty Ltd (Court of Appeal (NSW), 24 November 1998, unrep) Belflora Pty Ltd v Vinflora Pty Ltd (2021) 106 NSWLR 67; [2021] NSWCA 178 Birtchnell v Equity Trustees, Executors & Agency Co Ltd (1929) 42 CLR 384; [1929] HCA 24 Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley [1974] SCR 592 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) v Murry (1998) 193 CLR 605; [1998] HCA 42 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Williamson (1943) 67 CLR 561; [1943] HCA 24 Geraghty v Minter (1979) 142 CLR 177; [1979] HCA 42 Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2); Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Metals Ltd (2012) 200 FCR 296; [2012] FCAFC 6 Hellmann Insurance Brokers v Peterson [2003] NSWSC 242 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41; [1984] HCA 64 IceTV v Ross [2007] NSWSC 635 In the matter of Sunnya Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 403 Isaac v Dargan Financial Pty Ltd ATF The Dargan Financial Discretionary Trust (ABN 68 702 047 521) (trading under the name of Home Loan Experts) (2018) 98 NSWLR 343; [2018] NSWCA 163 Koops Martin Financial Services Pty Ltd v Reeves [2006] NSWSC 449 Lindner v Murdock's Garage (1950) 83 CLR 628; [1950] HCA 48 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Narellan Franchise Pty Ltd v RBME Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 988 Nicholls v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2012] NSWCA 383Howard v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2014) 253 CLR 83; [2014] HCA 21 Planet Fitness Pty Limited v Brooke Dunlop [2012] NSWSC 1425 Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen [1976] 1 WLR 989 Stacks Taree Pty Ltd v Marshall (No 2) [2010] NSWSC 77 Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd v City of Sydney 85 NSWLR 196; [2013] NSWCA 2 Tullett Prebon (Australia) Pty Ltd v Purcell [2008] NSWSC 852; (2008) 175 IR 414 Texts Cited: Evans, Power and Power, Equity and Trusts, (LexisNexis, 5th Edition, 2024) JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (LexisNexis, 5th Edition, 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sprout Trading NSW Pty Ltd t/as Sprout Ag (Plaintiff) PBH Trading Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Peter Lance Hollingworth (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Neggo (Plaintiff) R Notley (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate