NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Willmott v Adamo (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1682 Hearing dates: 19 December 2024 Date of orders: 19 December 2024 Decision date: 19 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: See [22] Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE - service outside Australia - application for leave to proceed and default judgment against the fourth defendant - whether the fourth defendant validly served with the statement of claim - where the fourth defendant is a dissolved company formerly registered in the United States of America - where the plaintiff relies upon UCPR pts 11 and 11A and the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters - whether the fourth defendant's dissolved status prevents the plaintiff from proceeding against it. Legislation Cited: New Hampshire Revised Statutes, §304-C:144, §304-C:137 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 11.7 Cases Cited: Willmott v Adamo [2024] NSWSC 682 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Claire Willmott (Plaintiff) Shona Adamo (First Defendant) Matthew Adamo (Second Defendant) Runstar Pty Ltd t/as Peppertown Gold Coast (Third Defendant) Alien Flier LLC (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: JC Sheller SC / B Julienne (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Clayton Utz (Plaintiff) Lander & Rogers (First and Second Defendants) Moray & Agnew (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 2022/00143770 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate