NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Robinson v Woolworths Group Limited [2025] NSWCATAD 8 Hearing dates: 04 September 2024 Date of orders: 09 January 2025 Decision date: 09 January 2025 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member Decision: Leave is refused under s 96(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) for the Applicant's complaint to proceed. Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS — discrimination — equal opportunity — leave required for complaint to proceed — principles applying to grant of leave Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: Chalker v Murrays Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAD 282 Dutt v Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 143 Jones v Ekermawi [2009] NSWCA 388 Langley v Niland [1981] 2 NSWLR 104 Munt v Workers Compensation Independent Review Officer [2020] NSWCATAD 156 Nicholls and Nicholls v Director General, Department of Education and Training (No 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Prakash v Bobb Borg Enterprises Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 73 Purvis v State of New South Wales [2003] HCA 62; (2003) 217 CLR 92 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 Spence v Roberts (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 361 Texts Cited: None Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Fiona Robinson (Applicant) Woolworths Group Limited (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate