NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Brown (a pseudonym) [2024] NSWDC 618 Hearing dates: 1 November and 17 December 2024 Date of orders: 17 December 2024 Decision date: 17 December 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 20 years with a non-parole period of 14 years Catchwords: CRIME — Child sex offences — Sexual intercourse with child over 10 and under 16 — Persistent sexual abuse of a child pursuant to s 66EA — Maintaining an unlawful sexual relationship with a child — — Indecent assault child under16 — Circumstances of aggravation — Incite person under authority to an act of indecency — Circumstances of aggravation — Child abuse material SENTENCING — Guidelines for sentencing — Role of guidelines SENTENCING — Mitigating factors — Plea of guilty SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment — Life imprisonment — Approach to assessment of objective seriousness SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Form 1 offences — Deterrence — General deterrence — Moral culpability — Objective seriousness — Multiple offences — What is a 'crushing' sentence — Special circumstances SENTENCING — Subjective considerations on sentence — Age of offender — Health issues — Multiple mental disorders — Learning deficits in childhood Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2013] NSWCCA 115 Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; (2014) 253 CLR 58 Burr v R [2020] NSWCCA 282 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Beattie [2017] NSWCCA 301 GP (a pseudonym) v R [2021] NSWCCA 180 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hillman v R [2012] NSWCCA 43 Hoskins v R [2016] NSWCCA 157 MAK v R; MSK v R [2006] NSWCCA 381 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen [1998] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 MK v R [2024] NSWCCA 127 Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; (2013) 249 CLR 600 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Burrell (2000) 114 A Crim R 207 R v Cahyadi [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 R v Clinch (1994) 72 A Crim R 301 R v Fisher [2024] NSWCCA 191 R v Harris [2007] NSWCCA 130; 171 A Crim R 267 R v Herring (1956) 73 WN (NSW) 203 R v Holder; R v Johnston [1983] 3 NSWLR 245 R v O'Connor [2014] NSWCCA 53 R v RB [2022] NSWCCA 142 R v Sellen (1991) 57 A Crim R 313 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 53 NSWLR 704 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 R v XX (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 RA v R [2024] NSWCCA 149 The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550 Towse v R [2022] NSWCA 252 Van Ryn v R [2016] NSWCCA 1 Xerri v The King [2024] HCA 5; (2024) 278 CLR 276 Category: Sentence Parties: Gary Brown (a pseudonym) (the offender) Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Representation: Counsel: S Hall SC with S Howell (for the offender) K Ratcliffe (for the Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate