NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sbat v Combat Sports Authority of NSW [2025] NSWCATAD 27 Hearing dates: 2 and 3 December 2024 Date of orders: 23 January 2025 Decision date: 23 January 2025 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: K Robinson, Principal Member Decision: (1) The decisions under review are affirmed. (2) Pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and s 78 of the Combat Sports Act 2013 other than to the Tribunal and respondents, any part of any paragraph of these reasons which commence with [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] other than the words in those brackets, is prohibited. Catchwords: COMBAT SPORTS ACT - administrative review – industry participant licences and prohibition order –- trainer – second – fit and proper person Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative tribunal Act 2013 Combat Sports Act 2013 Cases Cited: AJO v Director-General of Transport [2012] NSWADT 101 at [26] Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 316 Bronze Wing International Pty Limited v SafeWork New South Wales [2017] NSWCA 42 Combat Sports Authority of New South Wales v Fisher [2022] NSWCATAP 387 Ford v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATAD 87 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) (1955) 93 CLR 127 Maritime Union of Australia v Fair Work Commission [2015] FCAFC 56; 321 ALR 248 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 44 FLR 41 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Smith v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Stamatelatos v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 156 Sterjovski v Director-General, Department of Transport [2002] NSWADT 10 Sullivan v Civil Aviation Authority (2014) 22 FCR 555; [2014] FCAFC 93 Tukel v Combat Sports Authority [2023] NSWCATAD 180 YG and GG v Minister for Community Services [2002] NSWCA 247 Texts Cited: Anti-Doping Policy 2015, Combat Sports Authority of NSW World Anti-Doping Code 2021, World Anti-Doping Agency Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hany Sbat and Adam Omar (Applicants) Combat Sports Authority of NSW (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: DF Elliot (Applicants) K Heath (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate