NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nichles v R (No 2) [2024] NSWDC 626 Hearing dates: 17, 23 September 2024 Date of orders: 23 September 2024 Decision date: 23 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: Appeal from Local Court – The Deputy Registrar at Waverly refused to issue a large number of subpoenas which the appellant wanted to be issued – Appellant initially appealed to a magistrate at Waverly, but did not appear either in person or AVL – The Magistrate dismissed the appeal – Held: no appeal lies to the District Court from an interlocutory decision – In any event the subpoenas were oppressive and there appears to be no legitimate forensic purpose for them. Legislation Cited: Nil. Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Tuxford & Ors [2002] NSWCA 139 at [22]. Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125. The Queen v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14. Texts Cited: Nil. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown – R (NSW) Appellant - Kimberley Nichles Representation: Counsel: Crown – Ms Ng, L. Appellant – Self-represented.
Solicitors: Crown – Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW). Appellant – Self-represented. File Number(s): 2024/00065034 Publication restriction: Nil. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Local Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 9 August 2024 Before: Magistrate Shields
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate