NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Waluya Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning and Public Spaces [2025] NSWLEC 1062 Hearing dates: 7-8 November 2024 Date of orders: 6 February 2025 Decision date: 06 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Horton C Decision: The Court directs that: (1) Within 14 days, Waluya is to file and serve documents to describe the signage proposed, pursuant to Chapter 3 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Industry and Employment) 2021. (2) Within 21 days, a joint expert report prepared by the traffic experts on any aspect of traffic operation arising from the proposed signage is to be filed with the Court. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: whether bus depot is permissible in B6 Enterprise Corridor Zone – whether inconsistency – whether capable of sensible operation – traffic generating development Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 3.28, 4.16, 8.7 Interpretation Act 1987, ss 30A, 35 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 22 State Environmental Planning Policy (Gosford City Centre) 2018 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 State Environmental Planning Policy (Industry and Employment) 2021, Ch 3, ss 3.1, 3.6, Sch 5 State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts – Regional) 2021, Ch 5, Part 5.3, 5.5, ss 5.4, 5.9, 5.13, 5.28 State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, Ch 2, ss 2.1, 2.7, 2.108, 2.112, 2.122 Cases Cited: Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd (2013) 201 LGERA 116; [2013] NSWLEC 147 Hastings Point Progress Association Inc v Tweed Shire Council (2009) 168 LGERA 99; [2009] NSWCA 285 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 21; [1991] HCA 21 Universal Property Group Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 179 Texts Cited: Blackshield T and Williams G, Australian Constitutional Law and Theory (Federation Press, 4th ed, 2006), Category: Principal judgment Parties: Waluya Pty Ltd (Applicant) Minister for Planning and Public Spaces Representation: Counsel: A Pickles SC (Applicant) F Berglund (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate