NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bavulo Pty Limited v Zhang Property Pty Limited [2025] NSWCA 9 Hearing dates: 19 November 2024 Date of orders: 11 February 2025 Decision date: 11 February 2025 Before: Payne JA at [1]; McHugh JA at [2]; Griffiths AJA at [3] Decision: Dismiss the appeal, with costs. Catchwords: EQUITY — Equitable remedies — Specific performance — Contract for the sale and purchase of land 2022 edition — where vendor issued a notice to complete — where completion did not occur — where vendor issued a notice of termination — where purchaser sought specific performance of contract in circumstances where vendor said to be in breach of contract — where purported breach related to the requirement that a notice of attornment be served by the vendor and held in escrow at least two business days prior to completion — whether vendor's failure to serve notice of attornment a "disentitling breach" such that it was relevant to or connected with the securing of completion Legislation Cited: Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 184 Strata Titles Act 1973 (NSW), s 70 (repealed) Cases Cited: Carr v Keys-Arenas (1981) 2 BPR 9498 Carrapetta v Rado [2012] NSWCA 202; (2012) 16 BPR 30,997 Chandos Developments Pty Ltd v Mulkearns [2008] NSWCA 62; (2008) 13 BPR 25,321 Doyle v Howey (1990) 6 BPR 13,401 HG & R Securities Pty Ltd v Sayer [2009] NSWSC 427; (2009) 14 BPR 27,045 Jillinda Pty Ltd v McCourt (1983) 3 BPR 9199 Kraguljac v A & B Property Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] SASC 1 Malouf v Sterling Estates Development Corporation Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 920 McNally v Waitzer [1981] 1 NSWLR 294 Neeta (Epping) Pty Ltd v Phillips (1974) 131 CLR 286; [1974] HCA 18 Sandpiper Kooragang Pty Ltd v Fortis Products Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1256; (2020) 19 BPR 40,689 Santangelo v Yates Holdings Victoria Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 397; (2022) 20 BPR 42,615 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bavulo Pty Limited (Appellant) Zhang Property Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M McCulloch SC / B Kasep (Appellant) V Bedrossian SC / H Stitt (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate