NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Theocharous v Theocharous [2025] NSWSC 45 Hearing dates: 4 February 2025 Date of orders: 4 February 2025 Decision date: 12 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: See [75] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – practice and procedure – plaintiff shared deceased's home – alleged promise of continued occupation – plaintiff commences family provision proceedings – no specific claim in summons for continued occupation of deceased's home in summons – claim for continued occupation made in in correspondence – caveat lodged but permitted to lapse – no injunction sought – executor commences separate proceedings for possession – family provision proceedings remain pending – possession granted, with costs Legislation Cited: Probate and Administration Act 1898 ss 44, 61 Succession Act 2006 s 65 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 6.12(1), 42.1, 42.14 Cases Cited: Byrd v Margiotta [2023] NSWSC 1556 Crisp v Burns Philp Trustee Company Ltd (Supreme Court (NSW), Holland J, 18 December 1979, unreported) Dodd v Dodd [2020] NSWSC 1094 Le v Angius [2022] NSWSC 240 Martinus Rail Pty Ltd v Qube RE Services (No 2) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 1483 Medway Oil and Storage Co, Ltd v Continental Contractors, Ltd [1929] AC 88 Milillo v Konnecke [2009] NSWCA 109 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Principal Proceedings Andrew Theocharous (Plaintiff) Harris Theocharous (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate