NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jiang v Han (No 2) [2025] NSWSC 48 Hearing dates: 7 February 2025 Date of orders: 13 February 2025 Decision date: 13 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: (1) The cross-claimants' motion is dismissed. (2) Pursuant to r 42.21(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), the cross-claimants are to provide further security for the cross-defendant's costs of the amended cross-claim in the sum of $185,000.00 within 14 days, such security to be provided by way of: (a) Payment into court; (b) An unconditional bank guarantee, in a form acceptable to the cross-defendant, from an authorised deposit-taking institution within the meaning of the Banking Act 1959 (Cth); or (c) Such other method ordered by the Court. (3) In the event that the security ordered is not provided within the time specified, that the cross-claim be stayed until further order. (4) The cross-claimants are to pay the cross-defendant's costs of the motions, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to set aside a notice to produce documents and a subpoena to produce documents – where parties have not served evidence ordered by court – where defendant claims that evidence is not materially relevant, lacks a legitimate forensic purpose and may breach confidentiality – application dismissed CIVIL PROCEDURE – costs – application for further security for costs – where material change in circumstances established – where considerably longer hearing fixed – where damages sought considerably increased – where defendant is in breach of the Court's orders to serve evidence –further security ordered Legislation Cited: Banking Act 1959 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 56(3), 57(1), 58(2) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18 Corporations Act 2001(Cth), s 201A Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 14.7, 14.8 Cases Cited: Brundza v Robbie & Co (No 2) (1952) 88 CLR 171; [1952] HCA 49 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Jiang v Han [2022] NSWSC 1398 Jiang v Han and Fortune New City (Yarraville) Development Ltd (unreported 24 September 2021) Mr D v Ms P [2020] NSWCA 174 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Zhao Qing Jiang (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Kairan Han (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Fortune New City (Yarraville) Development Pty Ltd (Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Reynolds (Plaintiff) Mr C Robinson (First Defendant/Second Defendant/Cross-Claimants) Mr A Blair (First Defendant/Second Defendant/Cross-Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate