NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dorsett [2024] NSWDC 641 Hearing dates: 3 September 2024 6 September 2024 Decision date: 16 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: King SC DCJ Decision: Convicted on each offence. SEQ 001 & SEQ 005: [25% discount for plea.] Special circumstances found – need for a longer period on supervised parole to obtain psychological and/or psychiatric counselling and/or treatment to cease accessing & possessing such material, to assist with his issues, and support his transition to a law-abiding life in the community. Indicative sentences: SEQ 001: 3 years & 6 months SEQ 005: 3 years & 6 months
Aggregate sentence:
Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 4 years with a NPP of 2 years to commence on 16 September 2024 and to expire on 15 September 2026, upon which date he will become eligible for parole, and a balance of term of 2 years to commence on 16 September 2026 and to expire on 15 September 2028. SEQ 004: [25% discount for plea] Sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 6 months commencing on 16 September 2024 and expiring on 15 March 2025. Sentences to be served concurrently. Forfeiture order made in respect of the mobile phone. (1 x RealMe Phone IMEI 868100438354 ) Catchwords: CRIME – Sentencing - NSW offence - possess bestiality material – where quantity of material in offender's possession very small, though depraved & highly offensive - lower end of objective seriousness CRIME - Sentencing – Commonwealth offences - use carriage service to access child abuse material - possess child abuse material obtained using a carriage service – consideration given to degree of overlap in offences charged – where images mostly of prepubescent children - offender's persistent and consistent denial and minimisation of his engagement with material - claims to possess but not access files depicting prepubescent children, or torture, & to delete them whenever he found them - where quantity of material voluminous (totalling 35,339 media files) & significant, some "in the highest category of depravity" but sample size small (1000 files) to protect investigators - factors relevant to assessing objective seriousness of each offence – where crimes are internet-based international, prevalent & difficult to detect - deterrence – remorse and contrition - subjective matters Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Lazarus v R [2023] NSWCCA 214 R v Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA152 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex Dorsett, Rickie Chase Representation: Counsel: Crown: Mr E McGinness, Defence: Mr J McKenzie
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate