NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Maximo Armando Pantoja v R [2025] NSWCCA 10 Hearing dates: 04 February 2025 Date of orders: 24 February 2025 Decision date: 24 February 2025 Before: Stern JA at [1] Garling J at [2] N Adams J at [96] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: SENTENCING – Appeal against sentence – Severity – Sentence manifestly excessive – Relevant factors on sentence – Objective seriousness – Sentencing statistics – Aggravating factors – Where actual bodily harm is inflicted – Where the aggregate sentence falls within the discretionary range allowed to a sentencing Judge CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – Sentencing proceedings – Whether comparable cases are relevant in determining duration of imprisonment and non-parole period – Whether comparable sentences fix an outer limit for the imposition of rational sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, ss 59(1), 61I, 61J Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, ss 3A, 54A Cases Cited: Black v R [2013] NSWCCA 265 Hili v R [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520 Hughes v R [2018] NSWCCA 2 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kentwell v R [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 R v SS (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWCCA 258 SC v R [2019] NSWCCA 25 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Maximo Armando Pantoja (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Stratton SC (Applicant) S Lind (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate