NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Stines v R [2025] NSWCCA 11 Hearing dates: 21 October 2024 Date of orders: 19 February 2025 Decision date: 19 February 2025 Before: Ward P at [1]; McHugh JA at [2]; Rothman J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – whether there was a failure to consider hardship of incarceration – whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 95 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A Cases Cited: House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Obeid v R (2017) 96 NSWLR 155; [2017] NSWCCA 221 Stines v R [2019] NSWCCA 115 Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Stines (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Kluss (Applicant) T Abdulhak (Respondent)
Solicitors: Ross Hill & Associates (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/281451 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 30 October 2023 Before: Latham ADCJ File Number(s): 2022/281451
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate