NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners - Strata Plan No 87639 v Karimbla Properties (No4) Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 58 Hearing dates: 12 February 2025 Date of orders: 13 February 2025 Decision date: 13 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Grant plaintiff leave to amend pleadings; amendments to date only from the date of the application to amend Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – pleadings – amendment – late application for amendment – where plaintiff served evidence-in-chief concerning alleged defects based on inspection of some of likely affected units – where plaintiff adduced evidence that such defects likely to be systemic – where lengthy settlement negotiations followed but were not successful – where plaintiff, with consent of defendant, served extensive further evidence – whether plaintiff should have leave to amend its List Statement to reflect that evidence – whether adequate explanation for delay LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – where pleadings to be amended to incorporate further allegations of defect and causes of action – where amendments arise out of same or similar facts – whether Court should order that amendments take effect only from the date of application to amend Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan No 90018 [2023] NSWCA 66 The Owners - Strata Plan No 87060 v Loulach Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1068 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: The Owners - Strata Plan No 87639 (Plaintiff) Karimbla Properties (No4) Pty Ltd ACN 102165195 (First Defendant) Karimbla Construction Services Pty Ltd ACN 093419875 (Second Defendant/First Respondent) Karimbla Construction Services Pty Ltd (NSW) ACN 152212809 (Third Defendant/Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC / C Chiam (Plaintiff/Applicant) G A Sirtes SC / S Steinhoff (Defendants/Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate