NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Option Holdings Pty Ltd v Meng Yu [2025] NSWCA 18 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 25 February 2025 Decision date: 25 February 2025 Before: Ward P; Basten AJA Decision: 1. Dismiss the applicants' summons seeking leave to appeal. 2. Order that the applicants pay the respondent's costs in the sum of $7,395.36. Catchwords: APPEALS – leave to appeal – where respondent granted summary judgment at first instance under r 13.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – where appeal has limited practical utility – appellant identified reference to issue of costs – monetary threshold – not satisfied Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.1,14.28 Cases Cited: Carolan v AMF Bowling Pty Ltd [1995] NSWCA 69 Cheng v Motor Yacht Sales Australia Pty Ltd t/as The Boutique Boat Company (2022) 108 NSWLR 342; [2022] NSWCA 118 Clarke v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 27 Hamod v State of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 375 Hynash Constructions Pty Ltd v BRP Industries Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 14 Young v Hones (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 338 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Option Holdings Pty Ltd (First Applicant) Howard Hao Ting Cao (Second Applicant) Meng Yu (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Tomaras (Solicitor) (Applicants) P Lin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate