NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lee v Belmore 88 Pty Limited [2025] NSWSC 96 Hearing dates: 20 February 2025 Date of orders: 20 February 2025 Decision date: 20 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: General discovery ordered Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Discovery — General discovery — Documents relevant to a fact in issue — Preferable to discovery categories in some cases — Overzealous argument over multiple categories and their application inconsistent with achieving overriding purpose — Practice Note SC Eq 11 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Compagnie Financière et Commerciale du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co (1882) 11 QBD 55 Gazal v Setiawan [2024] NSWSC 1046 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Derek Kuo Hsiung Lee (First Plaintiff) MNK Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff P3 Australasian Properties Pty Ltd Belmore 88 Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Dennis Raymond Bluth (Second Defendant) The Martinez HWL Practice Trust & The East HWL Practice Trust & The Warat HWL Practice Trust & The Marin HWL Practice Trust (Third Defendant) Troy Douglas (Fourth Defendant) Wetbar Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D W Rayment SC/R Hudson (First Plaintiff) P Afshar (First Defendant) A Barnett (Second and Third Defendants)
Solicitors: Marcus Connor & Co (First Plaintiff) Baybridge Lawyers (First Defendant) Gilchrist Connell (Second and Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2022/61560
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate