NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Weldon [2025] NSWCCA 21 Hearing dates: 13 December 2024 Date of orders: 7 March 2025 Decision date: 07 March 2025 Before: Davies J at [1]; Yehia J at [2]; R A Hulme AJ at [170]. Decision: (1) Crown appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Crown appeal – offences of dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm and failing to stop and assist after vehicle impact occasioning grievous bodily harm – whether the sentencing judge took into account self-induced intoxication as a mitigating factor – whether the sentencing judge erred in his approach to imposing an ICO – manifest inadequacy – exercise of the residual discretion Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 52A(3)(c), 52A(9), 52AB(2) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A(5AA), 44(2B) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5D Cases Cited: Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 CMB v Attorney-General (NSW) (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295; [1994] HCA 49 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Griffiths v The Queen (1997) 137 CLR 293; [1977] HCA 44 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 JM v R (2014) 246 A Crim R 528; [2014] NSWCCA 297 Kramer v R; R v Kramer [2023] NSWCCA 152 McGonigle v R [2020] NSWCCA 84 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120; [2011] HCA 39 Mustafa v R [2021] NSWCCA 164 R v Cahill [2015] NSWCCA 53 R v Deng (2007) 176 A Crim R 1; [2007] NSWCCA 216 R v Dunlop [2001] NSWCCA 435 R v FF [2023] NSWCCA 186 R v Greaves [2014] NSWCCA 194 R v Harris [2015] NSWCCA 81 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R 451; [2002] NSWCCA 489 R v Hill [2020] NSWCCA 197 R v Kyle [2014] NSWCCA 300 R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232 R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 R v Merillo [2017] NSWCCA 173 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 R v Pogson; R v Lapham; R v Martin (2012) 82 NSWLR 60; [2012] NSWCCA 225 R v Price [2016] NSWCCA 50 R v Pullen (2018) 275 A Crim R 509; [2018] NSWCCA 264 R v Reeves (2014) 243 A Crim R 559; [2014] NSWCCA 154 R v Rose [2024] NSWCCA 193 R v Russell [2022] NSWCCA 294 R v Sara [2020] NSWCCA 119 R v Speechley (2012) 221 A Crim R 175; [2012] NSWCCA 130 R v Weldon [2024] NSWDC 313 R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252; [2002] NSWCCA 343 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Stanley v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (2023) 278 CLR 1; [2023] HCA 3 Whelan v R (2012) 228 A Crim R 1; [2012] NSWCCA 147 Zheng v R [2023] NSWCCA 64 Texts Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Sentencing Options) Bill 2017 New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 11 October 2017 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Appellant) Dean Weldon (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Millward (Appellant) T Evers (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate