NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Rose v Manno Kingsway Pty Limited as trustee for the Manno Kingsway Unit Trust [2025] NSWCA 23 Hearing dates: 19 February 2025 Date of orders: 27 February 2025 Decision date: 27 February 2025 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Mitchelmore JA at [82]; Adamson JA at [83]. Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – Formation – Intention to create legal relations – "Fourth category" of Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 72 – Whether emails exchanged prior to formal loan agreement established an intention immediately to be bound CONTRACTS – Formation – Consideration – Past consideration – Where advance made nine days prior to execution of formal loan agreement – Whether loan agreement supported by consideration – Whether earlier advance constituted past consideration in respect of the formal loan agreement ESTOPPEL – Conventional estoppel – Where purported concession made in cross-examination – Where purported concession conflicted with contemporaneous documents – Whether purported concession provided a basis for a conventional estoppel claim Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd v Texas Commercial International Bank Ltd (in liq) [1982] QB 84; [1981] WLR 565 Australian Co-operative Foods Ltd v Norco Co-operative Ltd (1999) 46 NSWLR 267; [1999] NSWSC 274 Barrier Wharfs Ltd v W Scott Fell & Co Ltd (1908) 5 CLR 647; [1908] HCA 88 Bluebird Investments Pty Ltd v Graf (1994) 13 ACSR 271 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 153; [2001] NSWCA 61 Classic Maritime Inc v Lion Diversified Holdings Berhad [2010] 1 Lloyd's Rep 59; [2009] EWHC 1142 (Comm) Equus Corp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments Pty Ltd [2006] QCA 194 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; [2002] HCA 8 Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385; [1989] HCA 51 Forbes Engineering (Asia) Pte Limited v Forbes (No 4) [2009] FCA 675 Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter [2009] 2 SLR(R) 332 Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd (1937) 59 CLR 641; [1937] HCA 58 Howard Smith & Co Ltd v Varawa (1907) 5 CLR 68; [1907] HCA 38 Hunt v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 714 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503; [2000] HCA 36 Johnson Matthey Ltd v A C Rochester Overseas Corporation (1990) 23 NSWLR 190 Kennedy v Broun (1863) 13 CB (NS) 677; 143 ER 268 Kestell v Davey (No 3) [2023] WASC 289 Kramer v Stone [2024] HCA 48; (2024) 99 ALJR 126 Lampleigh v Braithwaite (1615) Hob 105; 80 ER 255 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; [1997] HCA 25 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406; [1983] HCA 11 Lictor Anstalt v MIR Steel UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 3316 (Ch) Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485; [1999] HCA 65 Ma Hongjin v SCP Holdings Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC 277 Marsden v Barclays Bank plc [2016] 2 Lloyd's Rep 420; [2016] EWHC 1601 (QB) Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353; [1954] HCA 72 Moratic Pty Ltd v Gordon [2007] NSWSC 5 Pao On v Lau You Long [1980] AC 614 Re Casey's Patents; Stewart v Casey [1892] 1 Ch 104 Re Douglas; Ex parte Starkey (1987) 15 FCR 475; (1987) 75 ALR 97 Retirement Services Australia (RSA) Pty Ltd v 3143 Victoria St Doncaster Pty Ltd (2012) 37 VR 486; [2012] VSCA 134 Ryledar Pty Ltd v Euphoric Pty Ltd (2007) 69 NSWLR 603; [2007] NSWCA 65 SAS Realty Developments v Kerr [2013] NSWCA 56 Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422; [1983] HCA 5 Thornton v Jenyns (1840) 1 M & G 166; 133 ER 291 Twenty Ninth Macorp Nominees Pty Ltd v Normal George [2017] VSC 136 Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster [1991] 4 All ER 136 Texts Cited: E Peel, Treitel: The Law of Contract (13th ed, 2011, Street & Maxwell) H Beale, Chitty on Contracts (Vol 1, 35th ed, 2024, Street & Maxwell) JD Heydon, Heydon on Contract: The General Part (2019, Thomson Reuters) KR Handley, Estoppel by Conduct and Election (2006, Street & Maxwell) MJ Leeming, Common Law, Equity and Statute: A Complex Entangled System (2023, Federation Press) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Peter Rose (Appellant) Manno Kingsway Pty Limited ATF the Manno Kingsway Unit Trust (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate