NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Haigh v Haddad [2025] NSWCA 28 Hearing dates: 25 February 2025 Decision date: 03 March 2025 Before: Ward P; Adamson JA Decision: (1) Refuse leave to appeal. (2) Order the applicants to pay the respondents' costs. Catchwords: APPEALS — Leave to appeal — appeal from summary dismissal — where multiple prior proceedings brought on behalf of related parties — abuse of process — reflective loss — whether reflective loss applies to indirect but ultimate shareholders — whether distinct loss of applicants can be discerned — whether appeal demonstrates an issue of principle, question of public importance, or reasonably clear injustice Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 101 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 13.2, 13.4, 14.28, 42.21 Cases Cited: CBRE (V) Pty Ltd v Trilogy Funds Management Ltd (2021) 107 NSWLR 202; [2021] NSWCA 316 Central Coast Council v Norcross Pictorial Calendars Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 75; (2021) 391 ALR 157 City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) [2001] NSWCA 94 Haigh v Department of Planning NSW [2022] NSWSC 1434 Haigh v Haddad [2024] NSWSC 904 In the matter of HIH Insurance Limited (in liquidation; De Bortoli Wines (Superannuation) Pty Ltd & anor v McGrath & ors [2014] NSWSC 774 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2006] NSWSC 559 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2007] NSWCA 291 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2008] NSWSC 593 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad [2010] NSWSC 594 Jazabas Pty Ltd v Haddad (Court of Appeal (NSW), 20 March 2009, unrep) Jazabas v Botany Council [2000] NSWSC 58 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; [1981] HCA 45 PPK Willoughby Pty Ltd v Baird [2019] NSWCA 48 Re Refugee Tribunal; Ex Parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82; [2000] HCA 57 Reichel v Magrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665 Rialto Sports Pty Ltd v Cancer Care Associates [2022] NSWCA 146 Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; [2001] NSWCA 142 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2021] AC 39; [2020] UKSC 31 Spencer v The Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118; [2010] HCA 28 State Bank of NSW Ltd v Stenhouse Ltd (1997) Aust Tort Rep 81-423 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen William Haigh (First Applicant) Dimitrios Kikiras (Second Applicant) Sam Haddad (First Respondent) State of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P E King (Applicants) V Thomas SC / H Rogers (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate