NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd v Pypy [2025] NSWSC 132 Hearing dates: 18 February 2025 Date of orders: 3 March 2025 Decision date: 03 March 2025 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Wright J Decision: (1) The Plaintiff have possession of the land described as Unit 109, 12-22 Dora Street, Hurstville, in the State of New South Wales, Torrens Title identifier 109/SP64498. (2) The Plaintiff have leave to issue a writ of possession forthwith in respect of the land described as Unit 109, 12-22 Dora Street, Hurstville, in the State of New South Wales, Torrens Title identifier 109/SP64498. (3) The Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs on a full indemnity basis. (4) The Defendant's amended notice of motion filed on 19 December 2024 is dismissed. (5) The Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of the amended notice of motion on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: CONTRACT - construction and interpretation – where court asked to determine meaning of clauses of deed of settlement and forbearance under s 73 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – no point of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 73 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Prime Capital Securities Pty Ltd ACN 623 195 871 (Plaintiff) Suriawati Pypy (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R O'Donnell (Plaintiff) A Avery-Williams (Defendant)
Solicitors: QBM Lawyers (Plaintiff) ALP Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2024/ 00113602
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate