NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Malouf v Davoren-Whereat [2025] NSWSC 133 Hearing dates: 26 February 2025 Date of orders: 26 February 2025 Decision date: 26 February 2025 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Chen J Decision: (1) Order, pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), that the plaintiff and second respondent pay, and are equally and severally liable for, the defendant's (Kurt Davoren-Whereat's) costs of and incidental to the interpleader notice of motion filed 28 October 2024 in the gross sum of $31,150. (2) Order that the costs payable to the defendant under order 1, above, be paid from the sum paid into Court pursuant to order 2 made on 28 November 2024. (3) Note that upon payment pursuant to order 2, the second respondent is liable to the plaintiff in the sum of $15,575. (4) Otherwise, no order as to the costs of the respondents. Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party – Costs orders in interlocutory proceedings – where application made by judgment debtor for gross sum costs orders following interpleader motion – whether interpleader entitled to complete indemnity of costs from funds in court – no issue of principle – gross sum costs order made COSTS – Party/Party – whether delay occasioned in bringing interpleader motion – lengthy email correspondence between parties – persistent correspondence from plaintiff's former tutor to judgment debtor requesting delay of filing of interpleader motion – "disentitling conduct" – whether judgment debtor promptly brought interpleader motion – no finding of disentitling conduct by judgment debtor – both respondents responsible for unreasonable incurrence of costs – apportionment of judgment debtor's costs between respondents – respondents found equally and severally liable for judgment debtor's costs Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: AA v PD (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 945 Connor John Malouf by his tutor Sam Malouf v Kurt Davoren-Whereat [2024] NSWSC 861 Firth v Centrelink (2002) 55 NSWLR 451 McPherson, Thom & Co v Sandhurst and Northern District Trustees, Executors and Agency Co Ltd [1929] VLR 295 NSW Land and Housing Corporation v DJ's Home and Property Maintenance Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] NSWSC 1167 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Connor Malouf by his tutor Sam Malouf (Plaintiff/First Respondent) Kurt Davoren-Whereat (Defendant/Applicant) George Mavrakis trading as Mavrakis & Associates Lawyers (Second Respondent) Veritas Law Firm Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Eardley (Plaintiff/First Respondent) C Marshall (Defendant/Applicant) J Rogers (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate