NSW Caselaw
SABIC v PETHERAN
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
SAMUELS, PRIESTLEY and MCHUGH JJA 5 February 1988, 16 May 1988 [1988] NSWCA 134
DAMAGES — hospital notes not objective evidence of complaints of pain. DAMAGES — alleged errors of fact — no question of principle.
ORDER Appeal dismissed with costs. Samuels JA I agree with McHugh JA. Priestley JA I agree with McHugh JA.
McHugh JA The plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries appealsagainst a judgment of Master Sharpe. She alleges that as the result of a number of factual errors in his reasons damages of $1,000 awarded to her were inadequate.
At about 5.30 p.m. on the 11th July, 1984, the plaintiff was a passenger in a taxi which struck a vehicle owned by the defendant. After the accident she was treated at the Casualty Department of Canterbury Hospital. On the 24th August, 1983 the plaintiff had also been involved in a motor vehicle accident when she was a passenger in a vehicle which struck a pole. The proceedings before Master Sharpe were concerned with the accident of 17th July, 1984. The Master found that, although the plaintiff may have suffered "transient anxiety and perhaps a mild degree of discomfort", there was no change in her condition as it existed immediately before that accident.
The Master said that the plaintiff "presented as a pathetic, grotesque, pain-ridden individual who could not bear to sit normally on a seat". He explained the nature of her claim and the evidence in support of it as follows:
"The basis of the plaintiff's claim to aggravation and for exacerbation of pre-existing injury is to be found in the viva voce evidence of the plaintiff and Dr. Gronow, namely, that during a few days of in-patient treatment at Sydney Hospital in July 1984 the plaintiff felt slightly better than she had before.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate