NSW Caselaw
MARTIN LEWIS SHIPWRIGHTS PTY LTD v HUTTON SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
HOPE (2), PRIESTLEY (3) AND CLARKE (1) JJA 16 March 1988
[1988] NSWCA 92
Nuisance — Injunctions — Orders made not sought in summons or at the hearing — error of law — provision in summons seeking "such further or other order as the court thinks fit" does not justify making substantive order without notice to the party against whom it is made.
ORDERS
The appeal is upheld. Orders 1 and 2 of 19 May 1987 are set aside. Order 4 is varied to exclude reference to orders | and 2. Otherwise the orders made by Bryson J on 19 May 1987 confirmed. The respondent should pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act.
Clarke JA The appellant has, for many years, conducted a shipwrights business in the grounds of the Royal Motor Yacht Club of New South Wales, Broken Bay Branch, at 46 Prince Alfred Parade, Newport. Immediately to the east of these premises is a private residence in which the respondents have lived since 1982. Their house is set in a pleasant residential area of high amenity enhanced by the proximity of Pittwater, ready access to facilities for boating and convenient access to other amenities.
However, during their residence they have found that waste materials from the appellant's sanding, grinding and spray painting operations, which are carried out in the normal course of a shipwright's business, was regularly deposited on their land in such a manner as to cause them considerable distress.
Accordingly, on 23 January 1986 they filed a summons returnable before the Equity Division of the court in which they sought the following orders: "1. An order that Martin Lewis Shipwrights Pty Ltd by itself, its servants and agents be restrained from carrying on sanding operations on boats and spray painting in such a manner as to escape onto the Plaintiff's property so as to constitute a nuisance to the Plaintiffs. 2. An order that the Defendant pay damages to the Plaintiffs in respect of damage suffered to the Plaintiff's property. 3. Costs. - 4. Such further or other order as the court thinks fit."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate