NSW Caselaw
WOOLWORTHS LTD v ALLEN
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P, SAMUELS and MCHUGH JJA 25 May 1988
[1988] NSWCA 180
WORKERS' COMPENSATION — "results from injury" — causation — two injuries — change in insurance of employer — whether incapacity results from one or both injuries — worker entitled to benefits of notional total incapacity — by whom compensation payable — trial judge (Manser J) holds incapacity "results from" second injury — whether erred in applying Pickersgill v Freightbases Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 117 — whether evidence to support award — held: (1) Evidence to support judge's conclusion and so decision immune from disturbance by Court of Appeal. Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd [1985] 4 NSWLR 139 applied. (2) (per Kirby P and Samuels JA) No error shown in consideration of whether incapacity resulted from relevant injury; (per McHugh JA) if by applying a test of "proximate cause" the trial judge erred, the error was to apply a too stringent test than that required by the statutory test "results from". Conkey & Sons Ltd v Miller (1977) 51 ALJR 583 and National & General Insurance Co Ltd v South British Insurance Co Ltd & Ors (1982) 149 CLR 327 considered. LAW REFORM — workers' compensation — apportionment of liability — successive injuries to worker — suggestion by Kirby P that s7A Workers' Compensation Act be amended to permit apportionment between different insurers as well as employers. Workers' Compensation Act 1926, s7a, s9, s11(2), s37(4). Compensation Court Act 1984, s32. ORDER Appeal dismissed with costs.
Kirby P This appeal illustrates once again the limits which apply to appeals on questions of law from the Compensation Court to this Court. It does so in the context of successive injuries which raise a question for determination concerning the attributability of the continuing incapacity of the worker, as found, to the respective injuries and his entitlement to compensation in the circumstances of a change in his employer's insurance between the injuries.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate