NSW Caselaw
G AND J SHOPFITTING AND REFRIGERATION CO PTY LTD (In liquidation) v LOMBARD INSURANCE CO (AUSTRALIA) LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
Hope, PRIESTLEY and CLARKE JJA 10 April 1989
[1989] NSWCA 80
Hope and Priestley and Clarke JJA This is an application for leave to appeal from a decision of Smart J dispensing with or alternatively discharging a jury in proceedings which up to this time have gone on for some eleven days. The occasion for the making of the order appears to have been a statement made by an employer of one of the jurors.
The claimant wishes the matter to proceed with a jury, either the old jury or a new jury, and the opponent wishes the matter to proceed before Smart J without a jury. The immediacy of the application was occasioned by an order of Smart J adjourning the proceedings until 2 pm tomorrow, 11 April.
In the opinion of the court there is no emergency or urgency which requires this application to be heard today, and it will be dealt with on an ordinary motion day of this court. The proceedings before Smart J will be stayed in the meanwhile.
The court accordingly orders that the application is adjourned to 17 April 1989. The proceedings at first instance are stayed up to and including 17 April 1989. Costs to be costs in the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate