NSW Caselaw
FAJKA v AQUILA STEEL COMPANY LIMITED SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P, PRIESTLEY and HANDLEY JJA 2 July 1990, 13 December 1990
[1990] NSWCA 60
PRACTICE — expert evidence — obligation under Pt36 R13A to serve expert report in advance of trial — on second day of trial counsel for plaintiff in personal injuries action seeks to call expert engineer on the issue of negligence — no written report served or obtained — trial judge (Maxwell J) refuses application — in default of expert evidence enters judgment for defendant and discharges jury — after judgment plaintiff's solicitors receive service by post of expert report provided by defendant — existence of such report not disclosed to trial judge — whether evidence of the existence of such report should be received by Court of Appeal — whether retrial should be ordered — held: (Kirby P and Handley JA; Priestley JA expressing no opinion) (1) The Court should not receive the further evidence in the circumstances. Radnedae v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1987) 9 NSWLR 231 applied; Meek v Fleming [1961] 2 QB 366 distinguished; (2) (per Kirby P) Even if such evidence were received and the discretion were exercised afresh, no different conclusion would be reached; (3) Discussion by Kirby P and Handley JA of the purposes and requirements of the Rule obliging service of expert reports before trial.
NEGLIGENCE — employer's alleged negligence — plaintiff's back injured while lifting a bundle of steel rods to a work bench — rods with hooks prone to ensnarement in other rods whilst being lifted — absence of expert evidence of an alternative system of work — evidence of availability of crane — absence of earlier complaints — held: (Kirby P and Priestley JA; Handley JA dissenting) (1) There was evidence which, if believed could justify a conclusion of negligence — accordingly the issue of the employer's liability should have been left to the jury. Hamilton v Nu-Roof (Western Australia) Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 18; Bankstown Foundry Pty Ltd v Braistina (1986) 160 CLR 301 applied; Malaxechevarria vy Sabemo Pty Ltd (Full Court, NSW) unreported, 24 September 1963) considered; (2) (by majority) New trial ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate