NSW Caselaw
NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL v JEFFREY JOSEPH DOYLE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ, KirBy P and SAMUELS JA 24 September 1990
[1990] NSWCA 136
Gleeson CJ By majority the Court is of the view that this is an appropriate case for the grant of leave to appeal. However, the Court considers that in the circumstances it is also appropriate to attach the following condition to the grant of leave. The condition is that if the claimant's solicitors desire to pursue the appeal, they will within fourteen days from this date give to the solicitors for the opponent a written undertaking that in any event the claimant will pay the costs of the claimant and the costs of the opponent of the appeal.
The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
This is an appropriate case for the grant of leave to appeal. However, the Court considers that in the circumstances it is also appropriate to attach the following condition to the grant of leave. The condition is that if the claimant's solicitors desire to pursue the appeal, they will within fourteen days from this date give to the solicitors for the opponent a written undertaking that in any event the claimant will pay the costs of the claimant and the costs of the opponent of the appeal.
The costs of the application for leave to appeal will be costs in the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate