AHROOM POOMPIRYAPINTE v THE COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE [1990] NSWCA 4
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
AHROOM POOMPIRYAPINTE v THE COMMISSIONER OF THE
AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ, KirBy P and SAMUELS JA
24 September 1990
[1990] NSWCA 4
Gleeson CJ (On application for expedited hearing of appeal)
The three claimants are three accused in a criminal trial which is part heard
before his Honour Judge Solomon and a jury of twelve in the District Court. The
trial commenced on 6 August and today is the thirty-first day of the trial.
On 17 August some proceedings were brought before Badgery-Parker J
concerning a ruling on evidence that had been given by Judge Solomon. The
nature of those proceedings was somewhat unusual. It suffices for present
purposes to say that on 28 August 1990 his Honour made, what I will describe
by using the neutral term, a ruling, which was at least potentially unfavourable
to the present claimants.
Today, on 24 September, the claimants have filed in this Court a notice of
appeal from the decision of Badgery-Parker J and a notice of motion seeking an
expedited hearing of the appeal with, of course, the consequent interruption or
further interruption of the criminal trial which that would carry with it as a matter
of practicality.
The motion for expedition is dismissed. In saying that I should indicate that the
view of the Court is that this does not necessarily involve our expressing or
having any opinion as to the correctness of the decision of Badgery-Parker J or
the course which he took procedurally in the matter.
The only order that the Court makes at the moment is that the notice of motion
for expedition is dismissed.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.