IAN BEER v SMITH'S OYSTER SERVICES PTY LIMITED [1990] NSWCA 22
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IAN BEER v SMITH'S OYSTER SERVICES PTY LIMITED
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ, PRIESTLEY and HANDLEY JJA
25 June 1990
[1990] NSWCA 22
Gleeson CJ This is an application for leave to appeal against the decision of
Carruthers Jgiven in this Court on 25 May 1990. The applicant for leave to appeal
was the prosecutor in a proceedings brought before a magistrate.
The allegation was that the respondent sold oysters or a package containing
oysters in contravention of certain provisions of the Pure Food Act 1908. That
Act has since been repealed.
The respondent was successful before the learned magistrate hut his Worship
stated a case on a point of law for the information of the Supreme Court and that
is the matter that came before Carruthers J. Carruthers J decided the point raised
in the case stated in a manner unfavourable to the prosecutor and reached the
conclusion that the magistrate did not err in dismissing the information.
The nature of the point raised before the magistrate and Carruthers J and
sought to be raised in this Court is fully set out in a written outline of argument
which we have considered and which has been further explained in careful oral
submissions made by counsel for the applicant this morning. We are told the
point is still one of some significance for the reason that although the legislation
has been repealed, the new legislation uses the term "package" and the question
of construction raised by the matter might arise again.
Nevertheless I am of the view that the application should be dismissed. I do not
consider that there is sufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of
Carruthers J to warrant the granting of leave to appeal, especially bearing in mind
the added circumstance that the legislation governing the prosecution has been
repealed. That combination of circumstances produces the result in my view that
the application for leave to appeal should be dismisscd with costs.
Priestley JA I agree.
Handley JA I also agree.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.