NSW Caselaw
WENTWORTH v RARES SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY JA 23 October 1990
[1990] NSWCA 183
Mahoney JA (On notice of motion dated 11 July 1990) This is a proceeding whichcomes before the court as the result of orders made by Handley JA.
There has been filed by Miss Wentworth a notice of motion of 11 July 1990.
That notice of motion seeks the following relief:
"1. The court give leave for the appeal to be withdrawn.
2. The costs of the proceedings before Waddell J in this matter be paid by the plaintiff/appellant on a party and party basis.
3. No other order as to costs."
The notice of motion has been filed in the context of an appeal which has been brought from a judgment of Waddell CJ in Eq
Miss Wentworth brought proceedings against Mr Stephen Rares, the defendant, for contempt of court. That proceeding was heard by Waddell CJ in Eq and was dismissed. Miss Wentworth lodged a notice of appeal against his Honour's judgment.
In relation to that particular matter, and in the context of it, an application was made for leave to appeal against a judgment of Kearney J. Kearney J had been considering an application made by Miss Wentworth in respect of her desire to subpoena a judge of the Court, Young J, to give evidence in the proceedings before Waddell CJ in Eq Kearney J refused the application made.
Miss Wentworth has sought leave to appeal against the judgment of Kearney J and that matter has been referred to the Court of Appeal to be dealt with at the same time as the appeal against the judgment of Waddell CJ in Eq
As I understand the position, Miss Wentworth contends that the appeal against the judgment of Waddell CJ in Eq was compromised between the parties on certain terms in relation, inter alia, to costs. Her contention is, as I understand it, that the agreement was made with solicitors and that the solicitors for Mr Rares have now repudiated the agreement and do not propose to carry it into effect. She has brought proceedings in the Equity Division with a view - I put the matter generally - to enforcing that agreement.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate