NSW Caselaw
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
SAMUELS, CLARKE JJA and Hope AJA 12 February 1991 [1991] NSWCA 5
Samuels JA We do not think that this is a proper case in which to grant leave to appeal. Ordinarily in refusing an application for leave we do not give reasons. In this case we will merely say this. First we are not satisfied that any error appears, sufficient to authorise the intervention of this court, in Mr Justice Powell's decision to grant the interlocutory relief which he granted on the material which was before him. Secondly, we take the view that it would be inappropriate for this court to intervene in the matter at this stage.
Accordingly we dismiss the summons with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate