HACIDE PTY LTD v COMMONWEALTH BANK [1991] NSWCA 135
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
HACIDE PTY LTD vy COMMONWEALTH BANK
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CLARKE JA
2 August 1991
[1991] NSWCA 135
Clarke JA This is a motion in which Mrs Poulos seeks, in effect, two
differenttypes of orders: first, she seeks a stay of execution for twenty-eight days
in order that her lawyers can give further consideration to an appeal. In all the
circumstances of this case I do not think there are any grounds on which a stay
should be granted. Secondly, she seeks an order that she be given access to the
premises during the next two weeks on days to be nominated on twenty-four
hours' notice for the purpose of the removal of personal belongings of her and her
family.
The respondent's representative, Mr J Lanser, has pointed out that on each
occasion access is given it is necessary for the Bank to have an officer at the
premises to let the representatives of Hacide into possession and to supervise the
premises while those persons remain in them. In these circumstances he submits
twenty-four hours notice is not a reasonable period of notice within which the
Bank would be required to provide the officer to supervise. On the other hand, he
indicates that the Bank is prepared to be reasonable and to allow Mrs Poulos and
her family to have such access as is reasonably necessary to remove possessions
and furniture from the premises.
The present application has been brought on with great haste and neither party
has really had enough time to gather together such evidence as they-may wish to
put before the court.
In these circumstances I think that I should order that the respondent provide
access between the hours of 9am and Spm tomorrow, that is, Saturday 3 August.
I make that order because Mrs Poulos has said that she had made arrangements
for removalists to come on the Saturday and Mr Lanser has filed an affidavit in
which he indicates that the Bank made arrangements to have someone available
tomorrow.
I will not, at this stage, however, make any further order for access. I think it
preferable in the exigency of the situation to stand the proceedings over to the
motion list on Monday. Accordingly, I will adjourn the proceedings until
10.15am on Monday 5 August 1991.