IBM AUSTRALIA LTD v NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES LTD [1991] NSWCA 150
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
IBM AUSTRALIA LTD v NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY JA
4 February 1991
[1991] NSWCA 150
Mahoney JA This is an application for expedition of an appeal. The
proceeding,I am informed, is before an Arbitrator consequent upon an order
made by the Chief Judge of the Commercial Division. The arbitration is, I am
informed, to commence on 11 March 1991, there is a period of three weeks set
aside for the hearing it.
The question has arisen as to the extent of the powers of the Arbitrator on the
arbitration. There are issues which I shall describe compendiously and somewhat
inaccurately as common law issues and issues under the Trace Practices
legislation.
The question has arisen of whether the facts having been determined, the
Arbitrator has power to make a decision so as to give relief as contemplated
under the Trade Practices Act.
Iam informed that the general effect of a decision by Rogers CJ Comm D upon
that matter has the effect of directing the Arbitrator that he has power to give the
relevant kind of relief as under the Trade Practices Act, that is, equivalent to that
arising under the Trade Practices Act, because of the terms of the agreement. I
have not attempted to state precisely and accurately the effect of the agreement
nor of his Honour's decision, but it is sufficient to put the matter in the way I
have.
The applicant IBM Australia Limited contends that the Arbitrator has no power
to make the kinds of orders sought under the Trade Practices Act legislation and
that the agreement in question does not, as it were, by consent, confer upon him
the equivalent power. It desires to test the effect of the decision of Rogers CJ
Comm D.
In this regard, Mr Collins for the respondent, accepts that the matter is
appropriate for expedition. The parties are agreed the matter should take some
three hours in argument.
In the circumstances, I am satisfied that it is an appropriate matter for
expedition. I direct that the hearing of the appeal be expedited. I direct the matter
be referred to the Registrar to settle the appeal papers. The parties are to attend
upon the Registrar and co-operate with him in this regard in the normal way. The
date for the hearing of the appeal will be fixed by the Registrar. Costs of the
application will be costs of the appeal.