NSW Caselaw
WENTWORTH v NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY JA, CLARKE JA and HopE A-JA 25 October 1991
[1991] NSWCA 281
Mahoney JA. On 17 July 1991 Katherine Wentworth ('the applicant') applied for an order that she be admitted as a barrister. The application came before Badgery-Parker J. His Honour referred the application to the Court of Appeal.
The applicant was not then qualified for admission as a barrister in the ordinary sense. She had proposed to complete qualifications by completing the examinations prescribed for the purpose as conducted by the Barristers Admission Board. At the time when her application was lodged, she had not completed all of those examinations. It is, at the present time, not yet clear whether she has successfully completed all of those examinations. Her application therefore was presumably based upon s 4(1) of the Legal Profession Act 1987 which empowers the Supreme Court of New South Wales to 'admit persons as barristers, whether or not as provided by subsection (2)'.
The Bar Association of New South Wales opposed her admission. It has filed grounds of its opposition and hasparticularised those grounds in detail.
Interlocutory applications have been filed in the proceeding, some by the applicant and some by the Bar Association. The applications now pending fall in general into the following groups:
(a) An application by the applicant that the Bar Association be dismissed from the proceeding and its particulars of objection struck out;
(b) An application in relation to the power of the Court of Appeal to hear the application for admission and the composition of the Court for that purpose;
(c) Applications in relation to the nature of the particulars given by the Bar Association and in respect of the form of certain of those particulars; and
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate