NSW Caselaw
FAY vy THE ROADS AND TRAFFIC AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES [NO 2]
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P, SAMUELS and PRIESTLEY JJA 4 and 5 July 1991, 22 August 1991
[1991] NSWCA 93
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — procedural fairness — Road Authority's consideration of resident's submissions — held: No elaborate analysis or theorizing required. Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 applied. HIGHWAYS — closure of median strip — duty to take into account "to the fullest extent possible" environmental matters — held Means so far as reasonably possible. Guthega Developments Pty Limited v The Minister (1986) 7 NSWLR 353 applied. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — decision of Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) to close median strip so as partly to prevent vehicular access from one road into another — application by local resident to Land and Environment Court for declaration dismissed — appeal to Court of Appeal — procedural fairness whether RTA under duty to accord — whether procedural fairness had:been accorded — held: assuming (a) that RTA had a duty to act in relation to the residents with procedural fairness; (b) that the residents had standing to bring a complaint to the Land and Environment Court; and (c) that such Court had jurisdiction to determine such complaint: the duty of procedural fairness in the circumstances of the case required the RTA to act impartially to give the resident an opportunity to be heard; no breach of duty had been established; there was no question of partiality by the RTA which had given detailed and repeated consideration to all submissions of residents. Rioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550; Bread Manufacturers of New South Wales vy Evans (1981) 56 ALJR 89 applied. HIGHWAYS — statutory duty of RTA to take into account "to the fullest extent possible" all matters affecting or likely to affect the environment by reason of activities undertaken — alleged failure to take into account particular submissions — held: (1) The duty to take into account "to the fullest extent possible" meant to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Guthega Developments Pty Limited vy The Minister (1986) 7 NSWLR 353 applied; (2) By that standard the RTA had not failed; (3) Appeal from the Land and Environment Court (Bignold J), accordingly, dismissed. WORDS and PHRASES — "to the fullest extent possible". Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s111. Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s20, s58. State Roads Act 1986, s27.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate