NSW Caselaw
HANRAHAN v AINSWORTH SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY JA 24 June 1991, 24 June 1991
[1991] NSWCA 141
Mahoney JA This is an application by Mr Hanrahan seeking the listing at an appropriate time of proceedings which have been brought against him by Mr Ainsworth. The proceedings brought by Mr Ainsworth are for a declaration that Mr Hanrahan was guilty of contempt (I summarise the first paragraph of the summons in the contempt proceedings) in that he did, in breach of an undertaking before the court and for purposes which were improper and collateral to the proceedings, furnish to a third party a sealed copy of verified answers to interrogatories there referred to.
Originally Mr Hanrahan asked that those proceedings stand over. The reason why he asked that they stand over was or at least included that there are civil proceedings pending between the parties and that, as I have described it in discussion of the matter, what took place in the contempt proceedings would overlap with the civil proceedings or vice versa. Application is now made by Mr Hanrahan to alter that decision and to obtain an order that the contempt proceedings be now listed and not await the determination of the civil proceedings.
Reference is made in the affidavit of his solicitor Mr Ironside to the pending civil proceedings. The parties are agreed that one aspect of the civil proceedings will be listed for call over in October 1991 and that it is anticipated that the hearing date to be given will be "sometime in 1992". Another aspect of the proceeding is apt to come on much later than that.
Mr Ainsworth neither consents to nor opposes the application that the contempt proceeding be now brought on for hearing. Mr Evatt's client, Mr Hanrahan, is content for the contempt proceedings to continue, notwithstanding that in the contempt proceedings, a criminal proceeding, something may occur which will affect his position in relation to the civil proceedings or otherwise he may be prejudiced.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate