PHILIPSEN v THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1992] NSWCA 187
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
PHILIPSEN v THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P MAHONEY CLARKE JJA
4 June 1992, 4 June 1992
[1992] NSWCA 187
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE — summons to District Court — application for
relief in nature of certiorari — satisfaction that grounds made out — parties agree
that orders should be made — absence of objection to order or to jurisdiction of the
Court of Appeal to grant relief — held: Orders should be made as consented.
Kirby P (Delivering the judgment of the Court): On 14 June 1991 Gallen DCJ
in the District Court purported to cancel an order for periodic detention which
had been made in respect of Wendy Loretta Spittals (the claimant).
The claimant has brought proceedings in this Court seeking relief, prerogative
in nature. Put shortly, it is claimed that there was a denial of procedural fairness
and compliance with the applicable legislation in the way in which the order in
the District Court was made. The claimant was not aware of the proceedings and
was not present when the order now challenged was made.
The District Court, the first opponent, has appeared to submit to any order of
the Court. The Director General of Corrective Services (the second opponent)
appears to consent to orders which are proposed by counsel for the claimant.
Those orders have been put before the Court in a document which I will initial
and which will be placed with the papers. In respect of the second order there
referred to, the amount for costs to be paid by the second deponent is to be noted
as agreed between the representatives of the claimant and the second deponent.
It does appear appropriate in the light of what has been disclosed today that
relief should be afforded. No issue in respect of the jurisdiction of the Court to
provide the relief has been raised. On the contrary, the second opponent joins in
the request that the Court make the orders sought. Accordingly, it is appropriate
to make the orders that are sought.
Therefore the Court by consent of the second opponent makes orders for relief
in the nature of the prerogative writ of certiorari. The actual orders will be in
accordance with the short minutes of order which, as I say, I will initial and which
will be placed with the papers.
Orders in accordance with Short Minutes of Orders initialled and placed with
papers.
Counsel:
Claimant: T Game
1st Opponent: R Barlow (Office of State Crown Solicitor) (submitting)
2nd Opponent: No appearance
Solicitors:
2 UNREPORTED JUDGMENTS
Claimant: R F McIlwaine
1st Opponent: H K Roberts (Submitting)
5 2nd Opponent: No appearance
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.