NSW Caselaw
WITHAM v HOLLOWAY (No 1) SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P 24 August 1992 [1992] NSWCA 281
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE — contempt — failure of contemnor or solicitor to appear at call-over before Registrar — matter returned before Judge — whether stay of sentence for contempt ordered by Hodgson J should be lifted — evidence of withdrawal by former solicitors — HELD: (by Kirby P): Stay should not be lifted but orders for expedition and due prosecution of appeal made for default of which stay may be lifted. Supreme Court Act 1970, s46 (1).
Kirby P Mr John Allen Witham appeals to this Court from an order made by Hodgson J on 22 April 1992. The hearing of the appeal has not yet taken place. The appeal was listed before the Registrar on 12 August 1992 for the purpose of settlement of the appeal papers. This is a step ancillary to the hearing of the appeal. Mr Witham did not appear.
It seems that, shortly before that date, Mr Witham's former solicitors withdrew from representing him. The notice which was sent to him may not, in the clearest of terms, have informed him that he was obliged to be present when the papers for the appeal were listed to be settled by the Registrar. In such circumstances it would not be just to dismiss the appeal now for want of prosecution or to lift the stay of the execution of the sentence under appeal.
It is imperative that the appeal should come before the Court without delay. This is because the sentence imposed by Hodgson J, for the contempt on the part of Mr Witham which his Honour found, has been stayed by the order of the Court effectively until the termination of the appeal.
I must make it entirely clear that, if on the next occasion, Mr Witham does not appear before the Registrar so that the appeal papers can be settled in order that the appeal can proceed with due expedition, the matter will be restored to my list on the following day. I will there and then, after affording opportunity to Mr Witham to be heard, revoke the stay.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate