NSW Caselaw
JUPP v YOUNG
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY JA
20 July 1992
Mahoney JA This matter comes before me today upon a motion for, as it is described, directions as to the further steps, if any, to be taken in relation to the motion presently before the court seeking committal of Mr Gary Young for contempt in relation to the present proceedings.
The order in question was an order that was made by the Court of Appeal constituted by the President, Clarke and Cripps JJA on 22 April 1992.
Mr Kalfas is seeking, as he described it, at least in part a clarification of that order in view of the fact that Pamela Jill Jackman is not in a position financially to finance those proceedings.
There is not before the court a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before the Court of Appeal on 22 April 1992.
I think the appropriate course is that the matter should be referred to a court constituted as it was then constituted to determine the issues.
Whether I have the power to do what is now sought, I do not think I should pre-empt the purposes of the court on that particular day and what the purpose of that court would be in view of the circumstances now disclosed.
I will direct that the matter be stood over to a date to be fixed by the Registrar for that purpose when that court can be constituted.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate