TANTEX INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED v BIVIANO [1993] NSWCA 261
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
TANTEX INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED v BIVIANO
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MEAGHER JA
9 August 1993
[1993] NSWCA 261
Meagher JA. In this matter, on 6 August 1993, Cohen J dismissed an
application by Tantex Investments Pty Ltd against Mr and Mrs Biviano seeking,
in the first place, an adjournment and, in the alternative, a continuation of an
injunction.
His Honour dismissed both of these applications and the correctness of his
Honour's reasons is now in dispute.
Tam content to say that I agree with his Honour's decision and with the reasons
which his Honour advanced.
Leave to appeal from his Honour's judgment is now sought, not only on the
basis of the material which was before his Honour on 6 August, but also on the
basis of certain additional affidavits which it is sought to read before me. I
permitted the reading of those affidavits, subject to objection, but, in my view,
havingread them, I must come to the conclusion they are inadmissible. They do
not comply with the standard rules about the admission of fresh evidence and that
means, for the determination of the present application, I have to look at the
matter on the basis that the evidence before the Court is the same evidence which
was before Cohen J.
In these circumstances I regret to say that the present application must be
dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.