WATT v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1993] NSWCA 283
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
WATT v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
SHELLER JA
7 December 1993
[1993] NSWCA 283
Sheller JA This is an application by notice of motion by Oswald Gilchrist
Wattthat there be a stay of execution of a judgment given by Cole J on 27 October
1993 pending the hearing of the claimant's appeal.
The matter carne on for hearing before me on 29 November 1993 when I read
affidavits of Mr Watt and an affidavit on behalf of the opponent, the successful
plaintiff, the State Bank of New South Wales. The matter was adjourned to
today's date to give the claimant an opportunity to furnish further information to
the Court which the claimant has now done in an affidavit of 3 December 1993.
The judgment against the claimant was in the sum of $2 million and costs and
also a judgment for the plaintiff for possession of land at 53 Hunter Street,
Hornsby with leave to issue a writ of possession.
The claim was based upon guarantees given by the claimant and a personal
covenant in a mortgage in favour of the opponent over the land at Hunter Street,
Hornsby. It is, I think, unnecessary in the circumstances for me to go in detail to
the background which gave rise to these claims.
During the course of argument I was taken to Cole J's judgment. I was also
informed that his Honour had refused an application for a stay of execution.
Since judgment was given there has been correspondence between the solicitors
for the parties concerning whether or not there should be a stay, and in the course
of that correspondence the opponent's solicitors sought information about the
current asset and liability position of the claimant and asked questions about
whether there had been a disposal of assets.
The response to these requests in the correspondence was not to my mind
satisfactory. However, as I have said, most of this information has now been
provided in affidavit sworn by the claimant.
The claimant is prepared to give an undertaking, which I will spell out in due
course in more detail, not to dispose of assets. I have indicated that if a stay is
granted the hearing of the appeal will be expedited for hearing on 9 March 1994.
While I do not on my limited understanding of them find the grounds of appeal
suggested, or for that matter the matters of defence raised before Cole J,
compelling, I am of the opinion that the claimant is entitled to pursue them
uninhibited by the intervening enforcement of the judgment with the possibility
of prejudice to the claimant if he ultimately succeeds in his appeal.
On that basis I am prepared to grant a stay of execution.
Upon the claimant undertaking not to dispose of assets otherwise than in the
ordinary course of business and to ensure that payments are made as required by
the first mortgage over the premises at 53 Hunter Street, Hornsby, a further
undertaking within 14 days of today's date being provided to the opponent with
copies of his bank statements for the period commencing | May 1993:
I make O.1, O.2 and O.3 with the alteration that O.1 should read "be stayed
pending the determination of the appeal hearing" in the Notice of Motion.
2 UNREPORTED JUDGMENTS
I order that the hearing of the appeal be expedited and that it be listed for
hearing on 9 March 1994.
I order that the claimant file and serve the appeal books on or before 31
January 1994.
I order that the claimant file and serve written submissions on or before 25
February 1994.
l order the opponent to file and serve written submissions on or before 4 March
1994.
The costs of this application will be costs in the appeal.
Tadd to O.1 "provided that this order shall not prevent the opponent presenting
a petition for the sequestration of the claimant's estate but taking no further steps
therein".
Counsel are given such leave as is necessary to approach the Registrar for
settling of the appeal book and to make such application as to the form which the
appeal book should take. If there is any problem about that counsel may approach
me in Chambers.
I note the claimant gives the undertakings and that the claimant is in Court.